Legal Opinion
Williams v. Jones
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided July 8, 2009No. 06-7103PublishedCited by 45 opinions
1Per curiam
Petitioner-Appellant Michael Williams appeals from the district court’s denial of his habeas corpus petition brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The only issue before us is whether, having determined that Mr. Williams received ineffective assistance of counsel in rejecting a plea offer, the Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals (“OCCA”) fashioned a constitutionally permissible remedy. Our jurisdiction arises under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we reverse and remand. On remand, the district court should impose a remedy that comes as close as possible to remedying the constitutional violation, and is…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Miller-El v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Cuyler v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Lafler v. CooperSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Littlejohn v. TrammellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
- Clayton v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
- Dudley Bryant, Jr. v. Warden, FCC Coleman - MediumCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2013
- United States v. WamplerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.