Legal Opinion

Taplin v. Hinckley Fibre Co.

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided October 3, 1923PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButler, J.

The action is contract. The declaration contained the common counts and a special count predicated on the breach of an express contract between the parties for the labor by plaintiff with his team, made March 20, 1921, which contract was to commence April 1 following and to continue for one year. He commenced work about April 1 and continued at work under the contract until June 25, when he was discharged.

The declaration contains no allegation that the contract was in writing, and plaintiff’s evidence showed, and he now admits, that such was not the fact. The plaintiff testified fully as to…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Sartwell v. SowlesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1900
  2. Smith v. StantonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1843
  3. Pocket v. AlmonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1916
  4. Mattes v. . FrankelNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
  5. Dee v. KingSupreme Court of Vermont · 1905

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Dunbar v. Farnum WifeSupreme Court of Vermont · 1937
  2. Sferra v. UrlingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  3. Easton v. WycoffUtah Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Midlantic National Bank North, N.A. v. Borg-Warner Acceptance Corp. (In Re Mayo)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Vermont · 1990
  5. Couture v. LowerySupreme Court of Vermont · 1961

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API