Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Scholnick v. Schecter

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided December 12, 1990No. 2:90-cv-71999PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART CONTINENTAL BANK’S MOTION TO DISMISS

FRIEDMAN, District Judge.

This matter is presently before the court on defendant Continental Bank’s motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim, filed August 10, 1990. Plaintiffs have filed a response and Continental Bank has filed a reply. The court held a hearing on this motion on September 19, 1990.

I. Background

Plaintiffs Morton Scholnick and Stuart Freedman allege that in November 1985 they purchased interests in two limited partnerships: BRS Oil Associates 1985, L.P. (“BRS”) and GMK…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Affiliated Ute Citizens of Utah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Santa Fe Industries, Inc. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Chiarella v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Benzon v. Morgan Stanley Distributors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
  2. JAC Holding Enterprises, Inc. v. Atrium Capital Partners, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2014
  3. State of Mich. Ex Rel. Kelley v. McDonald Dairy Co.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1995
  4. Securities & Exchange Commission v. ConawayDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2010
  5. Benzon v. Morgan Stanley Distributors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API