Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Flourney v. Does 1-15

District Court, S.D. California

Decided September 27, 2022No. 3:21-cv-01767Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 BENJAMIN FLOURNEY, Case No.: 3:21-cv-01767-RBM-BGS CDCR #F-25814, 12 ORDER: Plaintiff, 13 vs. (1) GRANTING MOTION TO 14 PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS; FORMER CDCR SECRETARY DIAZ, 15 FORMER WARDEN POLLARD and (2) DISMISSING DEFENDANTS 16 CORRECTIONAL OFFICERS DIAZ, KILOUGH, MIRANDA, AND KILOUGH, MIRANDA, KIES AND 17 MOSELY FROM THE FIRST MOSELY, AMENDED COMPLAINT 18 Defendants. PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 19 §§ 1915(e)(2) & 1915A(b); and 20 (3) DIRECTING U.S. MARSHAL TO 21 EFFECT SERVICE OF FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Wilson v. SeiterSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Rizzo v. GoodeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API