Legal Opinion
United States v. Ein Chemical Corporation
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 17, 1958PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FREDERICK van PELT BRYAN, District Judge.
The plaintiff United States moves on various grounds, pursuant to Rule 12 (b) and (f), Fed.Rules Civ.Proc., 28 U.S. C.A., to strike from the answer of the corporate defendants a separate defense, two counterclaims and a set-off and counterclaim.
The action arises out of alleged over-payments made to defendants by the Economic Cooperation Administration in 1950-1951 for sulphur supplied by defendants to France under the Foreign Aid Acts by way of economic assistance, 22 U.S.C.A. § 1501 et seq.
According to the allegations of the amended complaint the…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Dalehite v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Larson v. Domestic and Foreign Commerce Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Skelly Oil Co. v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Co. v. HuffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Birnbaum v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1977
- Eugene Dupree v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1959
- Avery v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1977
- Woodbury v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1961
- Cruikshank v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1977
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.