Legal Opinion

L. Harvey & Sons Co. v. Rouse

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 12, 1932PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.

When the plaintiff brought suit to foreclose the mortgage, the defendants bad every needful opportunity to make any defense against a decree. They declined to resist for the reason no doubt that, according to all the evidence, they bad no available defense at law or in equity. They neither filed an answer, nor denied the debt, nor excepted to the judgment. They are consequently estopped from setting up any defense which was open to them on the former trial. Tbe proposed evidence could then have been offered.

It is a familiar maxim that a man shall not be twice vexed for the same cause. If a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Sills v. . FordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  2. Bunker v. Bunker.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  3. Dameron v. Rowland Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  4. Durant v. . CrowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887
  5. Roberts v. . MasseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ramsey v. . NebelSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  2. Yerys v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API