Legal Opinion
McCool v. Hillhaven Corporation
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided July 19, 1989No. A8610-06577; CA A48072PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*538WARREN, J.
Plaintiff appeals the dismissal of her common law claims for wrongful discharge and “outrageous conduct.” The trial court held that her amended complaint fails to state ultimate facts sufficient to constitute a claim.
In her wrongful discharge claim, plaintiff alleges, as relevant, that she is a licensed occupational therapist employed by defendant Park Royal Convalescent Center (Park Royal); that Park Royal is subject to OAR chapter 333; that from July 7 to July 15, 1986, defendant’s administrator, Duffy, undertook changes in the treatment of patients under plaintiffs supervision…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hall v. May Department Stores Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1981
- Holien v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1984
- Walsh v. Consolidated Freightways, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1977
- Patton v. J. C. Penney Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1986
- McQuary v. Bel Air Convalescent Home, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Olsen v. Deschutes CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
- Draper v. Astoria School District No. 1CDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1998
- Hirsovescu v. Shangri-La Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
- Farrimond v. Louisiana-Pacific Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
- Woods v. First American Title Insurance Co. of Oregon, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.