Legal Opinion

JOYE v. COMMISSIONER

United States Tax Court

Decided January 14, 2002No. 10338-00LUnpublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIMONE JOYE, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent

JOYE v. COMMISSIONER

No. 10338-00L

United States Tax Court

T.C. Memo 2002-14; 2002 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 14; 83 T.C.M. (CCH) 1091;

January 14, 2002, Filed

Respondent correctly determine in the notice of determination that petitioner is liable for the additions to tax. Respondent did not abuse respondent's discretion in determining in the notice of determination to proceed to collect the additions to tax under section 6651(a)(1) and (2). Respondent did not abuse respondent's discretion in determining in the notice of determination…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. HIGBEE v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUEUnited States Tax Court · 2001
  2. Helvering v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Goza v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2000
  4. Sego v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2000
  5. Katz v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2000

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Gray v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2012
  2. Miner v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2003
  3. Christman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
  4. Godwin v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2003
  5. CONNER v. COMMISSIONERUnited States Tax Court · 2005

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API