Legal Opinion
CONNER v. COMMISSIONER
United States Tax Court
Decided March 16, 2005No. 11617-03SUnpublished
1Opinion of the Court
DONALD W. AND KATHRYN B. CONNER, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent
CONNER v. COMMISSIONER
No. 11617-03S
United States Tax Court
T.C. Summary Opinion 2005-27; 2005 Tax Ct. Summary LEXIS 40;
March 16, 2005, Filed
PURSUANT TO INTERNAL REVENUE CODE SECTION 7463(b), THIS OPINION MAY NOT BE TREATED AS PRECEDENT FOR ANY OTHER CASE.
Donald W. and Kathryn B. Conner, Pro sese.
Lauren Epstein, for respondent.
Panuthos, Peter J.
PETER J. PANUTHOS
PANUTHOS, Chief Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of sections 6330(d) and 7463. 1 The decision to be entered is…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- HIGBEE v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUEUnited States Tax Court · 2001
- Goza v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2000
- Sego v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2000
- Woodral v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1999
- Katz v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2000
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.