Legal Opinion

In the Interest of Renteria

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 30, 1981No. 1828PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

YOUNG, Justice.

In this paternity ease, the trial court entered a final decree naming appellant, Rolando J. Renteria, the biological father of Rolando J. Renteria, Jr. The trial court theretofore overruled appellant’s motion for summary judgment based on the statute of limitations, Tex.Rev.Civ.Stat.Ann., art. 5529 (1958), because it found the period of limitations was tolled by the minority of the child under Tex.Rev.Civ.Stat.Ann., art. 5535 (Supp.1980). Thereafter, a trial was held in which the appellant announced he would not oppose the allegations made by the ap-pellee, Felicitas…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ackermann v. VordenbaumTexas Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Castilleja v. CameroTexas Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Bush v. StoneCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973
  4. Texas Department of Human Resources v. DelleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979
  5. Castilleja v. CameroCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Morgan v. American UniversityDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. Nuby v. Allied Bankers Life Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1990
  3. Givens v. DoughertyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1983
  4. Cornett v. DamonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1989
  5. In the Interest of RenteriaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API