Legal Opinion
Cook v. Pep Boys-Mannie, Moe & Jack, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided May 20, 1985No. 84-5271PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
LOUIS H. POLLAK, District Judge.
Plaintiffs, Robert and Idessa Cook, initiated this lawsuit in the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County in July 1984. The named defendants were Pep Boys— Mannie, Moe & Jack, Inc. (“Pep Boys”); Gilbarco, Inc.; Exxon Corporation; and Samuel Ross individually and trading as Samuel Ross Construction and S.A.R. The suit alleges a number of different tort claims against the defendants based upon injuries allegedly sustained by plaintiff Robert Cook while working for defendant Pep Boys. The injury was allegedly caused by a hydraulic lift manufactured…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Dorothy Quinn, Jacqueline Marchese and Nina Assajew v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- Self v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- Readinger v. GottschallSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- Newman v. Forward Lands, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1976
- Carlton Properties, Inc. v. Crescent City Leasing Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1962
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Knudson v. Systems Painters, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
- American Dredging Co. v. Atlantic Sea Con, Ltd.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1986
- Spring-Ford Area School Dist. v. Genesis Ins. Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2001
- Abels v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1988
- Simpson v. Union Pacific RailroadDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2003
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.