Legal Opinion
Mo Hock Ke Lok Po v. Stainback
District Court, D. Hawaii
Decided October 22, 1947No. Civ. A. 765PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DENMAN, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiffs seek a judgment declaring unconstitutional Act 104 of the Hawaiian Legislature enacted on May 1, 1943, entitled “An Act Regulating the Teaching of Foreign Languages to Children,” now embodied in Hawaiian Rev. Law, Chapter 31. They also seek to enjoin the defendants Superintendent of Public Instruction, the Governor and the Attorney General from their enforcement of that Act.
Two of the plaintiffs are Wah Chan Thom, a Hawaiian citizen of Chinese ancestry, having three children in the public schools of Hawaii, one 13 years of age and in the seventh grade, one…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Meyer v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Pierce v. Society of SistersSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Thornhill v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Schneider v. State (Town of Irvington)Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Lovell v. City of GriffinSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Dyer v. Kazuhisa AbeDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1956
- International Longshoremen's & Warehousemen's Union v. AckermanDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1949
- Alesna v. RiceDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1947
- Reinecke v. LoperDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1948
- Mo Hock Ke Lok Po v. StainbackDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1947