Legal Opinion
Alesna v. Rice
District Court, D. Hawaii
Decided December 4, 1947No. Civ. A. 769PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McLAUGHLIN, District Judge.
For a statement of the facts of this case which arises under the Civil Rights Act, 28 U.S.C.A. § 41(14), grows out of the 1946 strike in the sugar industry of Hawaii, and involves a criminal contempt indictment pending in a Territorial Circuit Court, see its initial phase reported in D.C., 69 F.Supp. 897. This reference discloses that a preliminary injunction issued restraining the defendant Attorney General of the Territory from proceeding further with the prosecution of the plaintiffs for contempt of the Territorial Court.
As mentioned in the intervening case of…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- United States v. United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- West Virginia State Board of Education v. BarnetteSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Thornhill v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Screws v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Dyer v. Kazuhisa AbeDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1956
- International Longshoremen's & Warehousemen's Union v. AckermanDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1949
- Cohen v. CahillCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
- California Retail Liquor Dealers Institute v. United Farm Workers of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Cohen v. CahillCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.