Legal Opinion

Mo Hock Ke Lok Po v. Stainback

District Court, D. Hawaii

Decided October 22, 1947No. Civ. A. 765Published

1Opinion of the Court

74 F.Supp. 852 (1947)

MO HOCK KE LOK PO et al.

v.

STAINBACK et al.

Civ. A. No. 765.

District Court, Hawaii.

October 22, 1947.

Wai Yuen Char, of Honolulu, T. H., and A. L. Wirin, of Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiffs.

Rhoda V. Lewis, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Thomas W. Flynn, Deputy Atty. Gen., for defendants.

J. Russell Cades and Edward Z. Buck, both of Honolulu, T. H., amici curiae, on question of jurisdiction.

Before DENMAN, Circuit Judge, and McCORMICK and METZGER, District Judges.

DENMAN, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiffs seek a judgment declaring unconstitutional Act 104 of the Hawaiian Legislature enacted on…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Meyer v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. Pierce v. Society of SistersSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. Thornhill v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  4. Reynolds v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  5. Schneider v. State (Town of Irvington)Supreme Court of the United States · 1939

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API