Legal Opinion

Nathan v. Municipality of Anchorage

Court of Appeals of Alaska

Decided March 27, 1998No. A-6635PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MANNHEIMER, Judge.

James G. Nathan appeals his conviction for driving while intoxicated, Anchorage Municipal Ordinance 9.28.020. After Nathan was arrested for DWI, he submitted to a breath test (which showed his blood-alcohol level to be .134 percent), and he declined the offer of an independent blood test. However, Nathan contends that the breath test result should be suppressed because, when he gave up his right to an independent blood test, he did not really understand his right to such a test.

Nathan is deaf, and has been since birth. In the trial court, Nathan asserted that, because of his…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Anthony v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Copelin v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1983
  3. State v. SundbergAlaska Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Ward v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Zsupnik v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1990

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Linton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2009
  2. Jenkins v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
  3. Burrece v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1999
  4. Winfrey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2003
  5. Linton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2009

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API