Legal Opinion · Dissent
Shoppers Food Warehouse v. Moreno
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided February 17, 2000No. 96-CV-21Published
1DissentSchwelb, Associate Judge
When this case was before the division, I explained in some detail why, in my view, Ms. Moreno has failed to establish that her claim “ar[ose] from” Shoppers’ contacts with the District of Columbia. See Shoppers Food Warehouse v. Moreno, 715 A.2d 107, 112-16 (D.C.1998) (Moreno I) (dissenting opinion). I pointed out that “[s]o far as we can discern from the record, Ms. Moreno would have suffered the injuries for which she seeks compensation in this action even if Shoppers had not advertised in the District at all.” Id. at 113. The suggestion that Ms. Moreno’s claim “arises from” Shoppers’…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Vons Companies, Inc. v. Seabest Foods, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1996
- Environmental Research International, Inc. v. Lockwood Greene Engineers, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1976
- John G. Kolbe, Inc. v. Chromodern Chair Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1971
- Verosol B v. v. Hunter Douglas, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1992
- Thomason v. Chemical BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.