Legal Opinion
Verosol B v. v. Hunter Douglas, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Virginia
Decided November 5, 1992No. Civ. A. 4:92cv23PublishedCited by 78 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
PAYNE, District Judge.
Verosol B.V., a Netherlands corporation, (“Verosol”) and Verosol USA, a Pennsylvania corporation and Verosol’s American subsidiary, (“Verosol USA”) initiated this declaratory judgment action under 28 U.S.C. § 2201 (1988) against Hunter-Douglas, Inc. (“Hunter-Douglas”), a Delaware corporation, and Bloch Enterprises, Inc. (“Bloch”), a Virginia corporation, seeking a declaration that a License Agreement entered into between Verosol and Hunter-Douglas was terminated by Verosol according to the terms of the Agreement.
Bloch filed motions to dismiss…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by78 opinions
- Lynch v. Vanderhoef BuildersDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2002
- Dicken v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1994
- Kay v. National City Mortgage Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2007
- Cognitronics Imaging Systems, Inc. v. Recognition Research Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2000
- JTH Tax, Inc. v. LeeDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2007
73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.