Branch v. Gurley
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtHiggins, J.
The judgment here for review is based on the jury’s answers (1) to the issue of negligence returned at the trial before Judge Hubbard, and (2) to the issue of damages returned at the trial before Judge Clark. Judge Hubbard, having set aside the verdict on the issue of damages only, as he had the right to do in his discretion, Hinton v. Cline, 238 N.C. 136, 76 S.E. 2d 162, the defendants are entitled to have us consider their assignments of error based on the exceptions to his rulings on the issues of negligence, and to Judge Clark’s rulings on the issue of damages.
The evidence in the light…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. NorrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- Spivey v. NewmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- King v. PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- Lake v. HARRIS EXPRESS, INCORPORATEDSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
- Powell v. CrossSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973
- Meade v. BelcherSupreme Court of Virginia · 1972
- Jernigan v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
- Joyner v. ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF CITY OF WINSTON-SALEMSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966