Legal Opinion
Brashear v. United States
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 9, 2012No. Civil Action No. 2011-1026PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JAMES E. BOASBERG, District Judge.
Plaintiff John Brashear is a retired Major General in the United States military who, in 2004, was treated for mild urinary incontinence at Walter Reed Army Medical Center in Washington, D.C. He contends that, over a series of months, medical malpractice by Army doctors left him with total urinary incontinence. Brashear filed a claim with the Army, alleging that negligent care by its doctors had caused his condition. The Army denied the claim, and less than six months thereafter, Brashear filed the instant action against the United States…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Lewis v. Washington Hospital CenterDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
- Woodworth v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2017
- Ghee v. Howard University Hospital, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2012