Woodworth v. United States
District Court, W.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
In Syposs, Judge Foschio recognized that although "the federal common law of privilege is applicable, and not state statutory privilege", in applying federal common law the court "should bear in mind the interests protected by a state-recognized privilege and may incorporate the privilege to the extent consistent with the federal policies implicated in a case". 179 F.R.D. at 409. Therefore, in deciding this motion I must first consider the State's interests underlying the peer review privilege, and then decide whether those interests are compatible with the federal policies implicated by the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Feres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Richards v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Hill v. Smithkline Beecham Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Anson v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2018
- Saraceni v. M&T Bank CorporationDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2021