Legal Opinion
United Shoe Workers of America, Local 132 v. Wisconsin Labor Relations Board
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided April 12, 1938PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRosenberry, C. J.
The record in this case is far from satisfactory. The so-called “findings of fact” are argumentative, are a narration of events rather than findings, and on material issues are tentative and inconclusive. They should conform to well-established rules. See Tesch v. Industrial Comm. (1930) 200 Wis. 616, 229 N. W. 194; Creamery Package Mfg. Co. v. Industrial Comm. (1933) 211 Wis. 326, 248 N. W. 140.
The board failed to comply with the act in another respect. Sec. 111.10 (6) of the act (sec. 111.01 et scq., Stats.) provides:
“Any person aggrieved by final order of the board granting or denying in…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Borgnis v. Falk Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
- Tesch v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
- American Furniture Co. v. I. B.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1936
- Creamery Package Manufacturing Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
3Cited by9 opinions
- School District No. 3 of Adams v. CallahanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1941
- City of Beloit v. Town of BeloitWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
- Transport Oil, Inc. v. CummingsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
- Clintonville Transfer Line, Inc. v. Public Service CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1945
- Universal Organization of Municipal Foremen, Supervisors & Administrative Personnel v. Wisconsin Employment Relations CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.