Universal Organization of Municipal Foremen, Supervisors & Administrative Personnel v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Commission
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHeffernan, J.
We agree that the petition ought to have been dismissed. The letter was not a “decision” which could be reviewed by a court. Hence, the court was without jurisdiction to proceed upon the merits. *319When it was determined that the matter before the court was not a “decision,” the court had jurisdiction only to dismiss the petition. While the merits of the ’controversy were carefully considered and represent a high order of legal craftsmanship, the portion of the judgment relating to the merits is a nullity.
The pertinent statutes provide:
Sec. 227.15, Stats.:
“Judicial review; orders reviewable.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Park Building Corp. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
- Frankenthal v. Wisconsin Real Estate Brokers' BoardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
- Wisconsin Telephone Co. v. Wisconsin Employment Relations BoardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1948
- United Shoe Workers of America, Local 132 v. Wisconsin Labor Relations BoardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
3Cited by10 opinions
- Wisconsin's Environmental Decade, Inc. v. Public Service CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
- Kegonsa Joint Sanitary District v. City of StoughtonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
- State Ex Rel. Thomas v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
- State v. WERCWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
- Wisconsin's Environmental Decade, Inc. v. Public Service CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.