Legal Opinion
United States v. Hunter
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided January 23, 2014No. Nos. 10-3085, 10-3086, 10-3087, 10-3088PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JUDGMENT
2Per curiam
These appeals from judgments of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia were presented to the court, and briefed and argued by counsel. The court has afforded the issues full consideration and has determined that they do not warrant a published opinion. See D.C. CIR. R. 36(d). For the reasons stated in the accompanying memorandum, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the judgment of conviction and sentence with respect to appellant Eddie Ray Kahn and the judgments of conviction with respect to appellants Stephen C. Hunter, Allan J. Tanguay, and Danny True be affirmed.…
3Cases cited27 opinions
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Ratzlaf v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Cheek v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Bryan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. Stephen HunterCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2016
- United States v. Asmerom KeletaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2020
- Brian J. Mahoney v. Nancy A. BerryhillDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2020
- United States v. Asmerom KeletaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2020
- United States v. Young-BeyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2025
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.