Legal Opinion

Group Italglass U.S.A., Inc. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided November 1, 1993No. Consolidated Court No. 91-09-00677PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion and Order

Newman, Senior Judge:

Plaintiff requests an order in limine limiting plaintiffs burden of proof on the issue of principal use. Further, in conformance with CIT Rule 26(c), plaintiff seeks a protective order to be relieved of answering defendant’s Second Set of Interrogatories; and plaintiff again moves, in the alternative, for summary judgment pursuant to CIT Rule 56.

Plaintiffs request for an order in limine concerning plaintiffs burden of proof is granted. A tariff classification controlled by use is determined in accordance with the principal use of the class or kind of…

2Cited by12 opinions

  1. E.M. Chemicals v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1996
  2. International Custom Products, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2005
  3. Minnetonka Brands, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2000
  4. BASF Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2006
  5. Latitudes International Fragrance, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2013

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API