Group Italglass U.S.A., Inc. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion and Order
Newman, Senior Judge:
Plaintiff requests an order in limine limiting plaintiffs burden of proof on the issue of principal use. Further, in conformance with CIT Rule 26(c), plaintiff seeks a protective order to be relieved of answering defendant’s Second Set of Interrogatories; and plaintiff again moves, in the alternative, for summary judgment pursuant to CIT Rule 56.
Plaintiffs request for an order in limine concerning plaintiffs burden of proof is granted. A tariff classification controlled by use is determined in accordance with the principal use of the class or kind of…
2Cited by12 opinions
- E.M. Chemicals v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1996
- International Custom Products, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2005
- Minnetonka Brands, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2000
- BASF Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2006
- Latitudes International Fragrance, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2013
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.