Legal Opinion

Latitudes International Fragrance, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided July 17, 2013No. Slip Op. 13-88; Court 11-00010ErrataCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GORDON, Judge:

This opinion follows a bench trial. Plaintiff, Latitudes International Fragrance, Inc., a California Corporation d/b/a Maesa Home (“Latitudes”), challenges the decision of Defendant U.S. Customs and Border Protection (“Customs”) denying Latitudes’ protest of Customs’ classification of the imported merchandise, described as “Bottle glass wavy RCL Machine blown diffuser bottle” (“subject merchandise,” “diffuser bottles,” or “bottles”) within the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (“HTSUS”). Customs classified the subject merchandise as “[gjlassware of a kind used for…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
  3. Jarvis Clark Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
  4. Orlando Food Corp. v. StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
  5. Carl Zeiss, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Dependable Packaging Solutions, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
  2. Allstar Marketing Group, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2017
  3. Rubbermaid Commercial Products, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2014
  4. Belimo Automation A.G. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2013
  5. United States v. Sterling Footwear, Inc.United States Court of International Trade · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API