Legal Opinion

Forest R. Preston v. Comm. of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided April 20, 2000No. 99-12993Published

Non-Argument Calendar.

1Per curiam

Taxpayer Forest R. Preston appeals the judgment of the tax court that certain payments made by Preston were not deductible as alimony under § 215 of the Internal Revenue Code. Among other things, Preston argues that payments to his former spouse and others for his children’s expenses were deductible as alimony based upon Commissioner v. Lester, 366 U.S. 299, 81 S.Ct. 1343, 6 L.Ed.2d 306 (1961). We affirm the tax court’s determination that these payments were child support under I.R.C. § 71(c) and, as a result, nondeductible to Preston under § 215. As to Preston’s other arguments, we affirm in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Commissioner v. LesterSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Winokur v. WinokurSupreme Court of Georgia · 1988
  3. Stone v. StoneSupreme Court of Georgia · 1985
  4. Butler v. HicksSupreme Court of Georgia · 1972
  5. Centel Communications Co. v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API