Winokur v. Winokur
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Clarke, Presiding Justice.
This case calls for a distinction between periodic alimony and lump sum alimony. The question is important because the obligation to pay periodic alimony terminates at the death of either party while the obligation to pay lump sum alimony in installments over a period of time does not. Dolvin v. Dolvin, 248 Ga. 439 (284 SE2d 254) (1981); Davenport v. Davenport, 243 Ga. 613 (255 SE2d 695) (1979). The Internal Revenue Code magnifies the importance by declaring periodic alimony taxable to the recipient and deductible by the payor, and installment payments of lump sum to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Stone v. StoneSupreme Court of Georgia · 1985
- Rooks v. RooksSupreme Court of Georgia · 1984
- Bisno v. BisnoSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
- Dolvin v. DolvinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1981
- Nash v. NashSupreme Court of Georgia · 1979
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Langley v. LangleySupreme Court of Georgia · 2005
- Patel v. PatelSupreme Court of Georgia · 2009
- Jarrett v. JarrettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1989
- Sapp v. SappSupreme Court of Georgia · 1989
- Andrews v. WhitakerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1995
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.