Legal Opinion

Stone v. Stone

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided July 1, 1985No. 42121PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Weltner, Justice.

The parties to this case, formerly husband and wife, entered into a settlement agreement, the stated purpose being that of “settling all questions of alimony, support, and property division.” A part of that agreement, which is the matter here in controversy, provided: “Alimony for the wife. 1. The Wife has titled in her name a 1982 Oldsmobile Toronado automobile which is presently in her possession and control. It shall be the responsibility of the Husband to pay the indebtedness owed thereon to Coffee County Bank as the same becomes due and payable commencing with the next…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Stokes v. StokesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1980
  2. Moore v. MooreSupreme Court of Georgia · 1982
  3. Harrell v. HarrellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1982
  4. Rooks v. RooksSupreme Court of Georgia · 1984
  5. Dolvin v. DolvinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Winokur v. WinokurSupreme Court of Georgia · 1988
  2. Conley v. ConleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1989
  3. Langley v. LangleySupreme Court of Georgia · 2005
  4. Holler v. HollerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1987
  5. Sapp v. SappSupreme Court of Georgia · 1989

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API