Legal Opinion

Hensler v. Warneka

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 7, 1927No. 25,715PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.

From an order refusing to amend the conclusion of law and denying a new trial the defendant bank appeals.

The short facts are these: The defendant bank held a mortgage upon the 223-acre farm of defendant Warneka, which for default was sold under foreclosure proceedings and bid in by the bank on June 28, 1924. The time for redemption expired June 28, 1925. Warneka, in November, 1922, let the farm for one year, with provisions for a three to five year renewal term, to Ostlund and Skalisky, under which they were to receive two-thirds of the crops raised and Warneka one-third, and for the pasture…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Willis v. MooreTexas Supreme Court · 1883
  2. McCray v. Superannuated Fund of the Evangelical AssnSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mehl v. NortonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
  2. Roehrs v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
  3. Schuchard v. St. Anthony & Dakota Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API