McCray v. Superannuated Fund of the Evangelical Assn
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.
Action for tbe conversion of certain grain; findings for defendant and appeal by plaintiff from tbe order denying a new trial.
The main facts are not in dispute. On April 27, 1923, plaintiff’s farm in Renville county, Minnesota, was bid in by defendant at tbe foreclosure sale of a mortgage given by plaintiff to defendant. In August following plaintiff leased tbe farm to one Hoffert for two ■years, the latter to deliver one-third share of the grain to plaintiff as rent. The tenant fall-plowed and planted all the crops on or before April 27, 1924, on which day the time of redemption expired. No…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Merryman v. BourneSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
- Hartzog v. Seeger Coal Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1914
- Martin v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1855
- Simers v. SaltusNew York Supreme Court · 1846
- Camp v. ScottSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1879
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Schuchard v. St. Anthony & Dakota Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
- Gallager v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- Hensler v. WarnekaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
- Gallager v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986