Legal Opinion

McCray v. Superannuated Fund of the Evangelical Assn

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 14, 1926No. 25,251PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.

Action for tbe conversion of certain grain; findings for defendant and appeal by plaintiff from tbe order denying a new trial.

The main facts are not in dispute. On April 27, 1923, plaintiff’s farm in Renville county, Minnesota, was bid in by defendant at tbe foreclosure sale of a mortgage given by plaintiff to defendant. In August following plaintiff leased tbe farm to one Hoffert for two ■years, the latter to deliver one-third share of the grain to plaintiff as rent. The tenant fall-plowed and planted all the crops on or before April 27, 1924, on which day the time of redemption expired. No…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Merryman v. BourneSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
  2. Hartzog v. Seeger Coal Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1914
  3. Martin v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1855
  4. Simers v. SaltusNew York Supreme Court · 1846
  5. Camp v. ScottSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1879

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Schuchard v. St. Anthony & Dakota Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
  2. Gallager v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  3. Hensler v. WarnekaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  4. Gallager v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API