Legal Opinion
Bredesen v. Rumsfeld
District Court, M.D. Tennessee
Decided June 26, 2007No. 3:05-00640PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
JOHN T. NIXON, Senior District Judge.
Pending before the Court are Plaintiffs, Governor of Tennessee Phil Bredesen (“Plaintiff’ or “Governor”), Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 64), and Defendant’s, Secretary of Defense Donald H. Rumsfeld (“Defendant” or “Secretary”), Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 61). Plaintiff has filed a Response in Opposition to Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 68), and Defendant has filed a Combined Reply in Support of Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss and Opposition to Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 72). Finally, Plaintiff has also filed a…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Mortensen v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
- Bowen v. Michigan Academy of Family PhysiciansSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Magnolia Neighborhood Planning Council v. City of SeattleCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
- Blagojevich v. GatesDistrict Court, C.D. Illinois · 2008
- Flanigan Ex Rel. Flanigan v. Westwind Technologies, Inc.District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2008
- Kerr v. HickenlooperDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2012
- MAGNOLIA NEIGHBORHOOD v. City of SeattleCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010