Legal Opinion

Ausley v. CCL Label (St. Louis), Inc.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 14, 2017No. ED 104439PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

James M. Dowd, Presiding Judge

This unemployment benefits case presents the question of when under the recently-amended Missouri Employment Security Law do work absences on the part of a terminated employee satisfy the defi-*392ration of “misconduct” so as to disqualify the employee from receiving unemployment benefits.

CCL Label (St. Louis), Inc. (“CCL”), appeals from the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission’s grant of unemployment benefits to Pamela Ausley, a former employee CCL terminated because of work absences. CCL claims that Ausley’s work absences constitute misconduct connected…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Hampton v. Big Boy Steel ErectionSupreme Court of Missouri · 2003
  2. Johnson v. Denton Construction Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1995
  3. Hoover v. Community Blood CenterMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. Fendler v. Hudson ServicesSupreme Court of Missouri · 2012
  5. McClelland v. Hogan Personnel, LLCMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Fisher v. Ste. Genevieve Cnty. Health Dep'tMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
  2. Weppner v. Shade Tree Service Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2017
  3. Cherise Brock and Anthony Brock v. Dr. Rishad ShaikhMissouri Court of Appeals · 2024
  4. George Chavis v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc., and Division of Employment SecurityMissouri Court of Appeals · 2022
  5. HILDA TAVENNER, Claimant-Appellant v. PRESBYTERIAN MANORS, INC., Employer-Respondent and MISSOURI DIVISION OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITYMissouri Court of Appeals · 2020

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API