United States v. Clark
District Court, S.D. Alabama
Criminal prosecutions by the United States against John M. Clark and against Pete Hamel. On motions by defendants to quash search warrants and to suppress evidence secured thereby.
1Opinion of the Court
ERVIN, District Judge.
These matters coming on to be heard on motions made in each of the cases to quash the search warrants and to forbid the use in evidence of the liquors seized by the officers under the warrants, and to further forbid the officers from testifying to what they saw while executing the warrants, because in one instance the officer failed to make a sufficient and proper return on the original war*534rant of his doings, and in the other case because the officer who executed the search warrant seized a large number of half pint bottles of whisky, and at the time of seizure destroyed…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Giles v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1922
- Rose v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1921
- United States v. KrausDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1921
- Murby v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1923
- Gibson v. HolmesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1905
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- McGuire v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Giacolone v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1926
- Denton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1937
- United States v. KlapholzDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1955
- State v. HuntSupreme Court of Missouri · 1970
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.