Legal Opinion

Cohn v. Isensee

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 23, 1920No. Civ. No. 3281PublishedCited by 27 opinions

PROCEEDING in Mandamus to compel a city clerk to provide ballots containing suitable blank spaces wherein electors may write in the names of persons not printed thereon. Peremptory writ issued. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtFinlayson, P. J.

This is an original petition for a writ of mandate to compel respondent, as the city clerk of the city of San Buenaventura, to provide for the use of the voters at a recall election, to be held in that city on the twenty-seventh day of this month, official ballots with blank spaces wherein the voter may write the names of persons whose names are not printed on the ballot.

It appears from the petition, to which a general demurrer has been interposed, that, following the filing of a recall petition, signed by the necessary number of qualified electors and petitioning for the recall of two of the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Bowers v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1892
  2. Eckerson v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
  3. Britton v. Board of Election CommissionersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Spier v. BakerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Sanner v. PattonIllinois Supreme Court · 1895

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Hough v. McCarthyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Otsuka v. HiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Communist Party of United States of America v. PeekCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Canaan v. AbdelnourCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  5. State v. Brotherhood of Railroad TrainmenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API