Legal Opinion

Krentsel v. Commonwealth

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 14, 1984No. Appeal, No. 2726 C.D. 1981PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge MacPhail,

Efim Krentsel (Claimant) has appealed from an order of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (Board) which found him ineligible for unemployment compensation benefits due to willful miscon*308duct. See Section 402(e) of the Unemployment Compensation Law, Act of December 5, 1936, Second Ex. Se<ss., P.L. (1937) 2897, as amended, 43 P.S. §802(e).

Claimant was employed by the Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority (SEPTA) as a disabled cashier when, on July 27, 1981, he was discharged for his failure to report to SEPTA’s Medical Director for a physicial…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Frumento v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  2. Kresge v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  3. Hubbard v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Anderson v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. Hudson v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API