Legal Opinion

Darab v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided April 9, 1993No. 85-CM-128, 85-CM-151PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROGERS, Chief Judge:

These twenty-four appeals arise from appellants 1 convictions by a jury of unlawful entry, D.C.Code § 22-3102 (Repl.1989), at the Islamic Center located at 2551 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C., on July 11, 1983. On appeal appellants contend that their convictions violated the Free Exercise and Establishment Clauses of the First Amendment. They also contend that the trial judge abused his discretion by replacing a regular juror with an alternate, and by denying a new trial based on misconduct of the courtroom clerk. The law controlling the constitutional claim…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Smith v. PhillipsSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Employment Div., Dept. of Human Resources of Ore. v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Reynolds v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  4. Remmer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  5. Johnson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Hinton v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
  2. Parker v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. Adam Jaramillo Ortberg v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
  4. Wesby v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
  5. Azariah Israel & Ronald Marquet Cheadle v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2014

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API