Legal Opinion

Akers v. D.L. White Construction, Inc.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided February 7, 2014No. 39493PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HORTON, Justice.

This appeal arises from a bench trial concerning an easement and trespass dispute. David and Michelle White, and D.L. White Construction, Inc. appeal from the district court’s judgment regarding the scope and location of the Whites’ easement across Dennis and Sherrie Akers’ property and the district court’s award of compensatory and punitive damages for trespass and emotional distress. We affirm the district court’s judgment locating the easement and awarding damages, but remand the case for apportionment of attorney fees.

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

This is the third…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. BMW of North America, Inc. v. GoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Cheney v. Palos Verdes Investment Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Myers v. Workmen's Auto InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Weinstein v. Prudential Property & Casualty InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Czaplicki v. Gooding Joint School District No. 231Idaho Supreme Court · 1989

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. A.H. v. Church of God in Christ, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2019
  2. H.F.L.P., LLC v. City of Twin FallsIdaho Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Nordgaarden v. KiebertIdaho Supreme Court · 2023
  4. Dennis L. Akers v. Marti MortensenIdaho Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Kara Alexander v. Vianna StibalIdaho Supreme Court · 2016

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API