Legal Opinion

Dennis L. Akers v. Marti Mortensen

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided April 27, 2016No. 42726PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HORTON, Justice.

This is an appeal from the district court’s apportionment of attorney fees on remand from Akers v. Mortensen, 156 Idaho 27, 320 P.3d 418 (2014) (Akers III). We affirm the district court’s apportionment and award of $55,917.21 in attorney fees.

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

This ease relates to a series of cases concerning the scope and location of Marti and Vernon Mortenseris easement across Dennis and Sherrie Akers’ property. The dispute has been heard multiple times by this Court. See Akers v. D.L. White Const., Inc., 142 Idaho 293, 127 P.3d 196 (2005) (Akers I); Akers…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Bach v. BagleyIdaho Supreme Court · 2010
  2. F. Kim Bailey v. Kerry BaileyIdaho Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Bettwieser v. New York Irrigation DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Akers v. D.L. White Construction, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Crowley v. CritchfieldIdaho Supreme Court · 2007

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Bergeman v. Select Portfolio ServicingIdaho Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Charles Hartgrave v. City of Twin Falls and SIFIdaho Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Andrews v. State, Industrial Special Indemnity FundIdaho Supreme Court · 2017
  4. Aguilar v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 2019
  5. Nancy J. Shepherd v. John M. ShepherdIdaho Supreme Court · 2016

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API