Legal Opinion

People v. Mungia

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 10, 1991No. E008096PublishedCited by 31 opinions

[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

TIMLIN, Acting P. J.—

Introduction

Edward Mungia (defendant) was charged in count 1 with robbery, a felony (Pen. Code, § 211) and in count 2 with unlawful possession of a hypodermic needle and syringe, a misdemeanor (Bus. & Prof. Code, § 4149). It was also alleged that he had suffered two prior serious felony convictions within the meaning of Penal Code section 667, and one prior felony conviction with service of a prison term within the meaning of Penal Code section 667.5, subdivision (b).

Defendant entered pleas of not guilty and denied the prior conviction allegations. On the day jury…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. People v. HayesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  2. People v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  3. People v. RolloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  4. People v. MoralesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  5. People v. ChurchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. People v. GonzalezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2018
  2. People v. GriffinCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  3. People v. AndersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  4. People v. WrightCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  5. People v. GomezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API