Legal Opinion

People v. Anderson

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 26, 2007No. C051985, C052358PublishedCited by 56 opinions

[CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HULL, J.

Effective January 1, 2006, the California Judicial Council adopted the “Judicial Council of California Criminal Jury Instructions (2006-2007)” which instructions are cited as “CALCRIM No._.” In the published portion of this opinion, we consider various challenges to a number of the new criminal instructions. Most of the challenges involve isolated language that defendant reads out of context from the instruction as a whole or the other instructions given to the jury. Other challenges concern language virtually identical to that previously approved in the CALJIC instructions…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Estelle v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Barnes v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. People v. RodriguesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. People v. LivingstonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
  2. People v. BattleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  3. People v. BordelonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  4. People v. GoldeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  5. People v. IbarraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API