Legal Opinion
Quinonez-Saa v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
Decided October 20, 1993No. 01-92-00976-CRPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MIRABAL, Justice.
A jury found appellant, Victor Hugo Qui-nonez-Saa, guilty of murder and assessed punishment at 75-years confinement and a fine of $10,000.
The evidence showed that the deceased had been shot at close range in the head with a .38 caliber bullet. In his first point of error, appellant asserts that the admission into evidence of autopsy photographs was reversible error because the medical examiner who testified had not performed the autopsy or viewed the body of the deceased.
The State offered into evidence a report, numbered 915231, on an autopsy that had been conducted on…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. Paul v. OatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- Huffman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
- Cole v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
- Hightower v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
- Bodin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Welch v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1995
- State v. TillmanMissouri Court of Appeals · 2009
- Joseph Prestiano v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2019
- Keith William Moore v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2010
- Keith William Moore v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2010
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.