Legal Opinion
Lenihan v. Tri-State Telephone and Telegraph Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided July 5, 1940No. 32,425PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Holt, Justice.
The state railroad and warehouse commission, hereinafter referred to as the commission, in 1929 instituted a proceeding against the Tri-State Telephone and Telegraph Company, hereinafter named the company, to inquire as to the reasonableness of its telephone rates in the St. Paul Metropolitan Exchange Area. It was an adversary proceeding wherein, after protracted hearings and voluminous testimony taken, the commission filed its order March 31, 1936, promulgating a schedule of rates. From this order the company appealed to the district court, claiming, among other things, that…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Morgan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- St. Joseph Stock Yards Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Wichita Railroad & Light Co. v. Public Utilities Commission of KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Wisconsin Telephone Co. v. Public Service CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
- State v. Tri-State Telephone and Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Sellers v. Iowa Power and Light CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 1974
- State Ex Rel. Jackson County v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
- State Ex Rel. Railroad & Warehouse Commission v. MeesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
- City of Minneapolis v. MINNEAPOLIS TRANSIT COMPANYSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
- St. Paul City Railway Co. v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.