Legal Opinion

In re Simoukdalay

United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee

Decided September 2, 2016No. CASE NO.: 1:15-bk-14988-SDRPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER AND MEMORANDUM

Shelley D. Rucker, UNITED STATES ■ BANKRUPTCY JUDGE

The court has before it the Debtors’ motion to alter or amend. The Debtors contend that the legal fees and costs associated with the Proof of Claim of Ann Chiang, claim no. 3, are either not allowed under the contractual documents or are excessive and should be reduced further. The court has jurisdiction to determine this matter under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1334(b) and 157(b)(2)(B). After reviewing the motion and the response, the court asked for additional briefing on the issue of what fees could be charged based on language in the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Intera Corporation v. George Henderson IIICourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
  2. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. World University Inc., Santa Barbara Center CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
  3. American Civil Liberties Union v. McCreary CountyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
  4. Killingsworth v. Ted Russell Ford, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2003
  5. House v. Estate of EdmondsonTennessee Supreme Court · 2008

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re PEGGY C. MANISUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API