Romano v. Weiss
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.
The plaintiffs Hugh and Mary Romano were the principal shareholders 3 of Fidelity Press, Inc., a cor poration which had been taxed since 1958 as an electing small business, or subchapterS, corporation. See 26 U.S.C. §§ 1371 et seq. (1970) . 4 The distinguishing feature of such a corporation is that corporate earnings (or losses) pass through and are taxed (or credited) directly to the shareholders, in proportion to their ownership interests, rather than to the corporation itself. The earnings pass-through occurs whether or not the earnings are actually distributed to the shareholders. Under…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Commissioner v. CulbertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Commissioner v. National Alfalfa Dehydrating & Milling Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Colucci v. Rosen, Goldberg, Slavet, Levenson & Wekstein, P.C.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1987
- Dial v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1955
- Robinson v. Contributory Retirement Appeal BoardMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1985
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Charles Reinhart Co. v. WiniemkoMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
- Global NAPs, Inc. v. AwiszusMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2010
- Coughlin v. GascombeMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2000
- Tenneco Inc. v. Commissioner of RevenueMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2003
- Charles Reinhart Co. v. WiniemkoMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.