Integrated Health Services of Michigan, at Riverbend, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the CourtRyan, J., joined by Batchelder, J.,
NATHANIEL R. JONES, J. (pp. 712-13), delivered a separate opinion concurring in the judgment.
OPINION
RYAN, Circuit Judge.
Once again, in a case involving nurses, the National Labor Relations Board has refused to apply § 2(11) of the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 152(11), as this court has interpreted it; and so, once again, we deny their petition for enforcement. And again, contrary to our previous cases, the Board has assigned the burden of proving supervisory status to the employer; and so, once again, we instruct the Board to follow our precedent. We conclude that the nurses…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Health Care & Retirement Corp. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Caremore, Inc., D/B/A Altercare of Hartville, Petitioner/cross-Respondent v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent/cross-PetitionerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- National Labor Relations Board v. Beacon Light Christian Nursing HomeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
- Beverly California Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board, Cross-ApplicantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
- Health Care & Retirement Corporation of America, Petitioner/cross-Respondent v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent/cross-PetitionerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.