Smart v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
CHRISTIAN, Judge.
The offense is theft, a felony; the punishment, confinement in the penitentiary for two years.
The caption fails to show the date of. the adjournment of the trial court. Under the decisions of this court the appeal must be dismissed. Cousineau v. State, 10 S. W. (2d) 98.
The recognizance for the appeal is fatally defective. It is in the form of an ordinary appearance bond. It fails to state that appellant was convicted of a felony, and nowhere therein is appellant bound to abide the “Judgment of the Court of Criminal Appeals of the State of Texas.” Art. 817, C. C. P.; Lynch v.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Read v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1928
- Lynch v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1925
- Cousineau v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1928
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. EcklesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1968
- Griffin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1932
- Moore v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1932
- Toms v. Hartford Fire InsuranceOhio Court of Appeals · 1945
- Wood v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1939
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.