Legal Opinion
State v. Eckles
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided May 20, 1968No. 8405PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CHAVEZ, Chief Justice.
By criminal information filed in the district court of McKinley County, appellant was charged as follows:
“I. That he did violate Section 40A— 16-2, N.M.S.A., 1953 Compilation, as amended, in that he did steal monies from Prentis Foster, by use or threatened use of force or violence on or about the 29th day of March 1965, in the County of McKinley, State of New Mexico.
“II. That he did violate Section 40A-4 — 1, N.M.S.A., 1953 Compilation, as amended, in that he did unlawfully take, restrain or confine Prentis Foster, by force or deception ; with intent that the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Moszczynski v. AsheSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
- People v. KehoeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- State v. McAfeeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
- Fletcher v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1963
- State v. BlackwellNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. McGruderNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. EverittNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1969
- State v. MossNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1971
- State v. PugaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1973
- Romero v. SanchezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.