Legal Opinion

Steinman v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided March 30, 1949No. 24317PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

The appeal is from a conviction in the county court of Archer County for the offense of driving a motor vehicle while intoxicated. We could hardly state the case more briefly than state’s attorney has in the following language.

“The prosecution was begun in the County Court and prose-r cuted only upon a complaint, no information having been filed.
“There are no bills of exceptions brought forward, and the statement of facts is found in the transcript, in violation of the provisions of Section 2, Article 760, Code of Criminal Pro*199cedure, and therefore may not be considered by…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kneedler v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1936
  2. Day v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1934
  3. Dodson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1896
  4. Pope v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1929

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Diez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1952
  2. Barner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1955
  3. Heath v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1951
  4. Heath v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1951
  5. Long v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API