Legal Opinion
Steinman v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Decided March 30, 1949No. 24317PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BEAUCHAMP, Judge.
The appeal is from a conviction in the county court of Archer County for the offense of driving a motor vehicle while intoxicated. We could hardly state the case more briefly than state’s attorney has in the following language.
“The prosecution was begun in the County Court and prose-r cuted only upon a complaint, no information having been filed.
“There are no bills of exceptions brought forward, and the statement of facts is found in the transcript, in violation of the provisions of Section 2, Article 760, Code of Criminal Pro*199cedure, and therefore may not be considered by…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Kneedler v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1936
- Day v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1934
- Dodson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1896
- Pope v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1929
3Cited by5 opinions
- Diez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1952
- Barner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1955
- Heath v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1951
- Heath v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1951
- Long v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1963