Legal Opinion

Davis v. City of Bandon

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 6, 1991No. LUBA 90-030 & 90-038; CA A67299Published

1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, P. J.

Petitioners own property in an 18-acre area, known as Coquille Point, in the city of Bandon. They seek review of LUBA’s affirmance of a moratorium on residential development in the area, imposed by the city pursuant to ORS 197.505 et seq.1 The area is planned and zoned for residential use but also contains valuable wildlife habitat and other significant resources. The city wants to acquire the area for park and related purposes and is attempting to obtain funding from the federal government and other sources for that objective.

ORS 197.520(3) provides, in part:

“A moratorium not based on a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State Housing Council v. City of Lake OswegoOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  2. State Housing Council v. City of Lake OswegoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  3. Kirpal Light Satsang v. Douglas CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
  4. Kirpal Light Satsang v. Douglas CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
  5. East McAndrews Neighborhood Ass'n v. City of MedfordCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API