Legal Opinion

Kirpal Light Satsang v. Douglas County

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 26, 1989No. LUBA 88-082; CA A51110PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, P. J.

Roseburg Resources, Coalition for the Preservation of Rural Community Life, John Thennes and Pamela Thennes (respondents) petition for Supreme Court review and, thereby, for our reconsideration of our decision. 96 Or App 207, 772 P2d 944 (1989). We allow reconsideration, principally to address respondents’ understanding of the scope of our decision.

We said:

“The threshold questions in this case are whether the September application was properly before the county before September 9[, 1987] and whether it qualified for disposition in accordance with ORS 215.428.” 96 Or App at 212.

We also noted…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Doughton v. Douglas CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  2. Kirpal Light Satsang v. Douglas CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Davenport v. City of TigardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  2. Sunburst II Homeowners Ass'n v. City of West LinnCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  3. Smith v. Douglas CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
  4. Davis v. City of BandonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API